COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS FOR TRANSIENT FLOW OF LIQUIDS IN PIPELINES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66411/jer.v6i6.403Keywords:
Transient Flow, Column Separation, Discrete Cavity Model, Vapor Cavity, Joukovsky's HeadAbstract
The work on the solution of liquid column separation in pipelines started as early as the 1930's of the last century. Early efforts were based on the investigations of the experimental works in search for a robust method to model and simulate the phenomena mathematically. In the late 1960's, a numerical model known as discrete vapor cavity model emerged, which is still in exclusive use up to the present time. The model became the main reference for most of subsequent works, which in turn contributed to the development and improvement of the model. in this paper, a thorough comparison is made between two approaches used to solve problems of column separation phenomenon; the well known Streeter's approach developed in 1969, and Carmona's approach developed in 1988. Both approaches are based on the vapor cavity model. The setup analyzed by Carmona is selected for the purpose of comparison, with different steady state conditions, by applying both approaches to the same pipeline system. The obtained results showed that the solution of the cavity as an adiabatic process suggested by Carmona, give better agreement with experimental data, than the famous Streeter's approach
References
[1] Alamyane, A., "Modeling and Simulation of Column Separation Phenomena in Water Pipelines", M. Sc. thesis, Mech. Eng. Dept, Alfateh university, 2003.
[2] Streeter. V. and Wylie, E., Fluid Transient, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1978.
[3] Simpson A. and Wylie E., "Towards an Improved Understanding of Waterhammer Column Separation in Pipelines", Civil Engineering Transaction, 1989.
[4] Yoshiharu S., “New Development in Protection Against Waterhammer”, IWSA, Special Report, Japan, 1980.
[5] Carmona R., Sanchez J. and Carmona L., "A Simplified Procedure to Evaluate Liquid Column Separation Phenomena", Water power and Dam Construction, Dec.1988.
[6] Martin C., Padmanabhan M. and Wiggert D., "Pressure Wave Propagation in Two Phase Bubbly Air-Water Mixture", 2nd Int. Conf. on Pressure Surges, Paper C1, BHRA Fluid Engineering, England, Sept 1976.
[7] Ewing D., "Allowing For Free Air in Waterhammer Analysis", 3rd Int. Conf. On Pressure Surges, paper C2, BHRA Fluid Engineering, England, Mar. 1980.
[8] Marsden N. and Fox J., "An Alternative Approach to the Problem Of Column Separation in an Elevated Section of Pipeline", 2nd Int. Conf. on Pressure Surges, Paper F1, BHRA Fluid Engineering, England, Sept 1976.
[9] Simpson R. and Wylie E., "Large Water Hammer Pressure for Column Separation in Pipelines", ASCE. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 117, No. 10, 1991 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:10(1310)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Engineering Research (Libya)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




